Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lee v. Lugo et al
as 1:2021cv02158
Defendant:
JACQUELINE Lugo, Mary P Walldan and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Ruben E Lee and Ruben E Lee, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. ELC Installation Company et al
as 1:2018cv03158
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Supplemental Retirement Fund , Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund and others
Defendant:
ELC Installation Company and Mary P Przekwas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Knopp et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank & Co et al
as 1:2016cv06669
Plaintiff:
Randal A Knopp and Mary P Knopp
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank & Co, James Dimon, Dean Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Hoessler et al v. Kia Motors America
as 1:2012cv09778
Plaintiff:
Mary P. Hoessler and Daniel E. Hoessler
Defendant:
Kia Motors America and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv03164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv04987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Mezyk et al v. U.S. Bank Pension Plan et al
as 3:2009cv00384
Plaintiff:
Joseph J. Mezyk, Mary P. Mulqueeny, Doris L. Carthy and others
Defendant:
U.S. Bank Pension Plan and U.S. Bancorp, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01956
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
