Cases 1 - 7 of 7
PRODUCT SOURCE INTERNATIONAL, LLC v. FOREMOST SIGNATURE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2015cv08704
Plaintiff:
PRODUCT SOURCE INTERNATIONAL, LLC
Defendant:
FOREMOST SIGNATURE INSURANCE COMPANY , MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY and FARMER'S INSURANCE EXCHANGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY v. RATAN, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv03596
Plaintiff:
MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant:
RATAN, LLC, RATAN GROUP HOTEL, LLC, GOVAN, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY v. AIU HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv07409
Plaintiff:
MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant:
AIU HOLDINGS, INC. and ARROWPOINT CAPITAL
Cross_claimant:
ARROWPOINT CAPITAL
Cross_defendant:
MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY and AIU HOLDINGS, INC.
Counter_claimant:
ARROWPOINT CAPITAL
Counter_defendant:
MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY and AIU HOLDINGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY v. JOHNSON SERVICES, LLC. et al
as 1:2012cv03613
Plaintiff:
MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant:
JOHNSON SERVICES, LLC., JOHNSON SPECIALIZED TRANSPORTATION, INC. and FORD MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY v. ALPHA PSI CHI, INC. et al
as 3:2011cv02318
Plaintiff:
MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant:
ALPHA PSI CHI, INC. and THE ESTATE OF FLORIAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TRADE ADVANTAGE, INC. v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY
as 3:2008cv05399
Plaintiff:
TRADE ADVANTAGE, INC.
Defendant:
MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY and MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
MAR-KHEM INDUSTRIES, INC. v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY - ZURICH NORTH AMERICA
as 1:2007cv04799
Plaintiff:
MAR-KHEM INDUSTRIES, INC.
Defendant:
MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY - ZURICH NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
