Cases 31 - 40 of 77
Garcia-Esteban v. Barr
as 19-155
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Julio Garcia-Esteban
Abregon-Hernandez v. Barr
as 19-173
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Rudi Abregon-Hernandez, AKA Rudy Abrego
Rodas-Rosales v. Barr
as 19-147
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Gerson Eliseo Rodas Rosales and M.J.R.G.
Gayle v. Barr
as 19-152
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Lynroy Gayle
Zepeda-Lopez v. Barr
as 19-145
Petitioner:
Carlos Alexander Zepeda-Lopez, Wuendy Yessenia Rodriguez-Cerda, Ansony Emmanuel Aguilar-Castro and others
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Lin v. Barr
as 19-140
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Wenhui Lin
Singh v. Barr
as 19-139
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Manjit Singh
Marroquin-Alas v. Barr
as 19-131
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Jose Ronald Marroquin-Alas
Jiang v. Barr
as 19-134
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Jingliang Jiang
Liu v. Barr
as 19-117
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Xue Yong Liu
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
