Cases 21 - 30 of 127
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv06090
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thomas v. Barr
as 19-303
Petitioner:
Harvel Thomas, AKA Terrell A. Cooley, AKA Edward J. Hogan, AKA Flu Fnu, AKA Nayquan James Nicholas, AKA Harvel Azan Thomas, AKA Edward James Hogan
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, Acting United States Attorney General
Chery v. Barr
as 19-297
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Lyxon Chery
Lucas-Carmelo v. Barr
as 19-302
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Bartolo Lucas-Carmelo
Frederic v. Barr
as 19-293
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Alex Frederic, AKA Alex Frederick
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00156
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv06087
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00155
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Marks v. Barr
as 19-292
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
George Owen Marks
Young v. Barr
as 19-285
Defendant / Appellee:
William P. Barr, United States Attorney General and Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice and United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
