Cases 51 - 60 of 127
Mohammed v. Barr
as 19-66
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Fusseini Mohammed
Pastor v. Barr
as 19-77
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Natalio C. Pastor
Romero-Carrillo v. Barr
as 19-35
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Felipe Romero-Carrillo, AKA Felipe Romero, AKA Felipe Romero-Carillo
Feng v. Barr
as 19-42
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Xuexia Feng
Lin v. Barr
as 19-140
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Wenhui Lin
Roldan v. Barr
as 19-12
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Jorge R. Roldan
Jin v. Barr
as 19-157
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Jian Le Li and Ai Fu Jin
Bagale v. Barr
as 19-5
Petitioner:
Dilli Ram Bagale
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Gonzalez-Polanco v. Barr
as 19-30
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Maria Fernanda Gonzalez-Polanco and Christopher Mauricio Orellana-Gonzalez
Wei v. Barr
as 19-6
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Qiang Wei
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
