Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Doe v. The University of Michigan et al
as 2:2026cv11440
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
The University of Michigan, The Regents Of The University Of Michigan, Drexel University and others
Cause Of Action: Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv00734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv00479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DOE v. Weiss et al
as 2:2025cv12598
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Matthew Weiss, Loyola University Chicago, Keffer Development Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Doe v. Weiss et al
as 2:2025cv12599
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Matthew Weiss, Simmons University and Keffer Development Services, LLC
Interested Party:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
DOE 1, et al v. HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY, et al
as 2:2025cv12600
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and Jane Doe 3
Defendant:
High Point University and Matthew Weiss
Interested Party:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Doe v. Weiss et al.
as 2:2025cv12601
Defendant:
Matthew Weiss, Malone University and Keffer Development, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Keffer Development Services, LLC Data Security Breach Litigation
as 2:2025md03159
Defendant:
James Joseph Harbaugh, Matthew Weiss [E-filer], Regents of the University of Michigan and others
Unknown:
Keffer Development Services, LLC Data Security Breach Litigation
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 25-10806, Jane Doe 25-10855, McKenzie Johnson and others
Interested Party:
Jane Doe 25-12600 and Jane Doe 25-12599
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Matthew Weiss v. Westlake Services LLC
as 25-12526
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WEISS
Defendant:
WESTLAKE SERVICES LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
