Cases 41 - 50 of 55
ALFONZO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv30719
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WILLIAM ALFONZO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv02100
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv03834
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FAUSETT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv00014
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WILLIAM FAUSETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARIS et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03136
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MARSHALL, BOBBY MARTIN, DAVID CALDWELL and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sepik v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv00606
Petitioner:
Matthew William Sepik
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Matthew Wheeler
as 17-15380
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MATTHEW WILLIAM WHEELER
USA v. James Long
as 17-15379
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES WAYNE LONG and MATTHEW WILLIAM WHEELER
USA v. Matthew Wheeler
as 17-15003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW WILLIAM WHEELER, a.k.a. Matthew Williams and JAMES WAYNE LONG, a.k.a. J.W. Long
Williams v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv21434
Plaintiff:
Matthew Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
