Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Stewart et al v. Air Canada
as 2:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Matthew Stewart and Megan McKay
Defendant:
Air Canada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Johnson v. Crete Carrier et al
as 2:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Matthew Johnson
Defendant:
Crete Carrier and Anthony Beatty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Righter v. Ballard et al
as 2:2023cv00917
Plaintiff:
Jordana Bree Righter
Defendant:
Timothy Ballard, Operation Underground Railroad, Inc., Deacon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jones et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00116
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular
Plaintiff:
Matthew Richard Jones and Ashlee Marie Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lefebre v. Christensen et al
as 2:2020cv00329
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lefebre
Defendant:
Richard Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whittington v. Shumway et al
as 2:2019cv00984
Defendant:
Penske Truck Leasing Corporation, United States Postal Service, Maxway and others
Plaintiff:
Sarita Whittington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Lowe v. CR Bard et al
as 2:2019cv00648
Defendant:
CR Bard and Bard Peripheral Vascular
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robertson et al v. IHC Health Services et al
as 2:2019cv00053
Defendant:
Craig S. Cook, Kurt O. Bodily, Tala'At Al-Shuqairat and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Robertson and Wanphen Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rosenthal v. Morris
as 2:2017cv01196
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Rosenthal
Defendant:
Matthew Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Demarco et al v. Nabors Industries et al
as 2:2016cv01242
Plaintiff:
M. Brandon DeMarco and Lana DeMarco
Defendant:
Nabors Industries, Nabors Well Services , Pool Well Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
