Cases 1 - 6 of 6
DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER et al v. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
as 2:2021cv02797
Plaintiff:
MAYA VAN ROSSUM, DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER and DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK
Defendant:
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
Petitioner:
Steven Gidumal, Virtus Capital Advisors LLC and PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK et al v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al
as 2:2020cv03412
Plaintiff:
MAYA VAN ROSSUM and DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK
Defendant:
ANDREW R WHEELER and UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Intervenor:
State of Mississippi, State of Texas, State of Montana and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK et al v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION et al
as 2:2018cv04508
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, GREGORY G. NADEUA, FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION and others
Plaintiff:
MAYA VAN ROSSUM, DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK and THE DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK et al v. SUNOCO PIPELINE L.P.
as 2:2018cv02447
Plaintiff:
DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK and THE DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER, MAYA VAN ROSSUM
Defendant:
SUNOCO PIPELINE L.P.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1251
DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK et al v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION et al
as 2:2017cv03348
Plaintiff:
DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK and MAYA VAN ROSSUM
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, GREGORY G. NADEAU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company LLC v. Delaware Riverkeeper Network et al
as 3:2013cv00046
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company LLC
Defendant:
Delaware Riverkeeper Network , Maya Van Rossum , Responsible Drilling Alliance and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Michael L. Krancer
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
