Cases 1 - 8 of 8
McLeod v. Innovage Holding Corp.. et al
as 1:2021cv02770
Plaintiff:
RANDY MCLEOD
Defendant:
INNOVAGE HOLDING CORP., MAUREEN HEWITT, BARBARA GUTIERREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
USA v. Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad Company, The et al
as 1:2019cv01913
Defendant:
Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad Company, The and American Heritage Railways, Inc.
Plaintiff:
USA
Special Master:
David M. Tenner
Amicus Curiae:
The Lawrence M. Cohen Family Trust, Ryan Patrick Davis d/b/a Hermosa Creek Grill, Blanche L. Tune and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
McLeod v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
as 1:2016cv01988
Plaintiff:
Anna McLeod
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Mcleod v. Central Mutual Insurance Company
as 1:2016cv01868
Plaintiff:
Scott Mcleod
Defendant:
Central Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramos et al v. Banner Health et al
as 1:2015cv02556
Plaintiff:
Lorraine M. Ramos , Constance R. Williamson , Karen F. McLeod and others
Defendant:
Banner Health , Banner Health Board of Directors, Laren Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
T2 Technologies, Inc. v. Windstream Communications, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03151
Plaintiff:
T2 Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Windstream Communications, Inc. and McLeod USA Telecommunications Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151
Harrington et al v. OppenheimerFunds, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv02602
Plaintiff:
Jeanne Harrington , Stephen D. McLeod , Paul Newlin and others
Defendant:
OppenheimerFunds, Inc., OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. and Angelo Manioudakis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McLeod v. Astrue
as 1:2009cv02018
Plaintiff:
Dianne J. McLeod
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
