Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Tuerpe v. Slootman et al
as 5:2024cv02502
Plaintiff:
Christopher Tuerpe
Defendant:
Frank Slootman, Michael Scarpelli, Benoit Dageville and others
Promise Public Schools, Inc. v. San Jose Unified School District et al
as 3:2020cv08555
Defendant:
Carla Collins, Teresa Castellanos, Jose Magana and others
Plaintiff:
Promise Public Schools, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv06788
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
McMahon v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2018cv01524
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Harper Motors
Plaintiff:
Gary McMahon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv08743
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Seltzer Caplan McMahon Vitek v. Vassallo
as 3:2010cv00394
Petitioner:
Seltzer Caplan McMahon Vitek
Respondent:
Alfred Louis Vassallo, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
Rosenbaum Capital LLC v. Kennedy et al
as 8:2009cv00537
Plaintiff:
Rosenbaum Capital LLC, Rosenbaum Capital LLC, Rosenbaum Capital LLC and others
Defendant:
Parker S Kennedy, Parker S Kennedy, Parker S Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Seltezer Caplan McMahon Vitek v. Abnos
as 3:2008cv00201
Petitioner:
Seltezer Caplan McMahon Vitek
Respondent:
Damon Abnos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Abnos v. Hejmanowski et al
as 3:2008cv00058
Plaintiff:
Damon Abnos
Defendant:
Lee Hejmanowski, Seltzer Caplan McMahon Vitek and DOES 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jack and Doris Stephens et al v. Country Coach Inc et al
as 5:2007cv00843
Plaintiff:
Jack Stephens, Jack Stephens, Doris Stephens and others
Defendant:
Country Coach Inc, McMahons RV and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
