Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Marin v. Educational Testing Service
as 24-817
Plaintiff:
MEL M. MARIN
Defendant:
EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE
Danielle Victor v. Southwest Wine and Spirits, LLC, et al
as 23-55256
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIELLE VICTOR
Defendant / Appellee:
SOUTHWEST WINE AND SPIRITS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, WALLYS AUCTION HOUSE, LLC, a California limited liability company, MEL-JEN, a California limited liability company and others
Timothy Larios v. Scott Lunardi, et al
as 20-15764
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT LUNARDI, R. J. JONES, FOSTER, Lieutenant and others
Defendant:
MEL HUTSHELL and JOSEPH A. FARROW
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY LARIOS
Daron Oliver v. Duane Shelton, et al
as 20-15008
Defendant / Appellee:
DUANE SHELTON, TREVOR HATLEY and MEL, Sgt.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARON MICHAEL OLIVER
Frank Cruz v. H. Kharazi, et al
as 19-16926
Defendant / Appellee:
YARRA LAW GROUP, MEL ABDELAZIZ, MARGARET MIMS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANK CRUZ
Cathy DeForest, et al v. Ashland Gun Club, Inc., et al
as 19-35095
Defendant / Appellee:
MEL WINNER, CHUCK PARLIER, GEORGE FRITSCHI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEON PYLE, EDWARD KERWIN and CATHY DEFOREST
Defendant:
CITY OF ASHLAND, a municipay subdivision of the State of Oregon, JERRY WISDOM, board members of the Ashland Gun Club Inc., as individuals and RAYMOND RENTERIA
Jordana Bauman v. Mel Marin
as 17-55784
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JORDANA MARINKOVIC BAUMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MEL M. MARIN
Cathy DeForest, et al v. City of Ashland, et al
as 16-36024
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CATHY DEFOREST, LEON PYLE and EDWARD KERWIN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ASHLAND, a municipay subdivision of the State of Oregon, ASHLAND GUN CLUB, INC., a domestic non profit corporation, CHUCK PARLIER and others
James McNeil v. James Walker, Warden
as 09-73679
Petitioner:
JAMES R. MCNEIL
Respondent:
MEL EPLY and JAMES WALKER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
