Cases 61 - 70 of 85
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv06264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01068
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Maraio v. Mel S. Harris and Associates, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv09624
Plaintiff:
Daniel Maraio
Defendant:
Mel S. Harris and Associates, LLC, Mel S. Harris, John Does Numbers 1 Through 25 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Canale v. Mel S. Harris and Associates, LLC
as 1:2009cv09606
Plaintiff:
Steven Canale
Defendant:
Mel S. Harris and Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Petersen v. Mel S. Harris & Associates, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv04385
Plaintiff:
Jeval Petersen
Defendant:
Mel S. Harris & Associates, LLC and Rushmore Recoveries X LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sykes v. Mel S. Harris and Associates LLC et al
as 1:2009cv08486
Plaintiff:
Monique Sykes
Defendant:
Mel S. Harris and Associates LLC, Mel S. Harris, Michael Young and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv61486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2009cv07680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
