Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Bordelon v. Merck & Co Inc et al
as 5:2013cv02569
Plaintiff:
Gene Bordelon
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc , Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp , Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker v. Merck & Co Inc et al
as 5:2013cv02461
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lynn Walker
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc , Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp , Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stafford v. Merck & Co Inc et al
as 1:2013cv02386
Plaintiff:
Jacklin Hardison Stafford
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc, Merck Sharp & Dohme Italia S P A Inc, Novo Nordisk A/S and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stafford v. Merck & Co Inc et al
as 2:2013cv02386
Plaintiff:
Jacklin Hardison Stafford
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc, Merck Sharp & Dohme Italia S P A Inc, Novo Nordisk A/S and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stafford v. Merck & Co Inc et al
as 1:2013cv02349
Plaintiff:
Jacklin Hardison Stafford
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Endsley v. Merck & Co Inc et al
as 5:2012cv02161
Plaintiff:
Jincy Endsley
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sedatol v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp et al
as 6:2012cv02115
Plaintiff:
Beryl Sedatol
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp and Warner Chilcott Sales U S L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murphy v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp
as 5:2011cv02222
Plaintiff:
Elaine L Murphy
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simpson v. Merck & Co et al
as 5:2011cv00815
Plaintiff:
Charleszetta Simpson
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp , Louisiana State University Health Science Center-Shreveport, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
