Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Liang et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 3:2024cv00724
Plaintiff:
Jiacheng Liang and Xiya Shi
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and Attorney General Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Toyi v. Mayorkas et al
as 3:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
FARAH TOYI
Defendant:
Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, JENNIFER B. HIGGINS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01689
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01568
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ABUSRIH v. MAYORKAS et al
as 3:2023cv01533
Plaintiff:
NIZAR ABUSRIH
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedures Act
DENG et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 3:2023cv01286
Plaintiff:
XIANG DENG, FANG WANG, RENXIAO DENG and others
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
