Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Hetzel et al v. Estrada et al
as 2:2020cv00170
Defendant:
Mesquite Gaming, LLC d/b/a Casablanca Resort & Casino, Margarita Estrada and Casablana Resorts, LLC d/b/a Casablanca Resort & Casino
Plaintiff:
Kathlyn Hetzel and Roy Hetzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hetzel et al v. Estrada et al
as 2:2020cv00167
Defendant:
Mesquite Gaming, LLC d/b/a Casablanca Resort & Casino, Margarita Estrada and Casablana Resorts, LLC d/b/a Casablanca Resort & Casino
Plaintiff:
Kathlyn Hetzel and Roy Hetzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00922
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
IHC Health Services v. Mesquite Gaming
as 2:2015cv00866
Plaintiff:
IHC Health Services
Defendant:
Mesquite Gaming
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00145
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Sierra Development Company v. Chartwell Advisory Group Ltd.
as 3:2013cv00602
Counter Defendant:
3535 LV Corp., Affinity Gaming, Inc., Archon Corp. and others
Counter Claimant:
Chartwell Advisory Group Ltd.
Defendant:
Chartwell Advisory Group Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Sierra Development Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
IHC Health Services v. Mesquite Gaming et al
as 2:2013cv00596
Plaintiff:
IHC Health Services
Defendant:
Mesquite Gaming and Healthsmart Benefit Solutions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
