Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Pappey v. Finisar Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00167
Plaintiff:
Frederick Theodore Pappey
Defendant:
Michael L. Dreyer, Robert N. Stephens, Helene Simonet and others
Bushansky v. Finisar Corporation et al
as 5:2019cv00446
Defendant:
Michael L. Dreyer, Robert N. Stephens, Helene Simonet and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Davis v. Finisar Corporation et al
as 3:2019cv00271
Plaintiff:
William Davis
Defendant:
Michael L. Dreyer, Robert N. Stephens, Helene Simonet and others
Sharma v. Finisar et al
as 5:2019cv00220
Plaintiff:
Pankaj Sharma
Defendant:
Finisar, Michael L. Dreyer, Robert N. Stephens and others
Wheby, Jr. v. Finisar Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00064
Plaintiff:
Earl Wheby, Jr.
Defendant:
Helene Simonet, Michael L. Dreyer, Robert N. Stephens and others
Klein v. Finisar Corporation et al
as 5:2019cv00155
Defendant:
II-VI Incorporated, Michael L. Dreyer, Robert N. Stephens and others
Plaintiff:
Melvyn Klein
Tenvold v. Finisar Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00050
Defendant:
Michael L. Dreyer, Robert N. Stephens, Helene Simonet and others
Plaintiff:
Pete Tenvold
Rice v. Ultratech, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv03290
Plaintiff:
Dennis Rice
Defendant:
Ultratech, Inc. , Michael C. Child, Joel F. Gemunder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kenney v. Gertel
as 5:2012cv02268
Plaintiff:
James Kenney
Defendant:
Eitan Gertel , Jerry S. Rawls , Kurt Adzema and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Stockholders Suits
Robert Lynch, et al v. Jerry Rawls, et al
as 09-17379
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT LYNCH, Attorney, Derivatively on behalf of Finisar Corporation, CITY OF WORCHESTER RETIREMENT SYSTEM, LYNN SHORT, suing derivatively on behalf of Finisar Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SAWCZAK and JAMES ROCCO
Defendant - Appellee:
JERRY RAWLS, STEPHEN K. WORKMAN, DAVID BUSE and others
Defendant:
FINISAR CORPORATION, Nominal Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
