Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Bou Hamdan v. Chertoff, et al
as 1:2007cv00700
Plaintiff:
Ziad Kamal Bou Hamdan
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Alberto Gonzales, Raymond P Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
v. Herrera-Perez et al
as 1:2007cv00597
Defendant:
Francisco Herrera-Perez, Michael Chertoff and Robert E Jolicoeur
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Tetruashvili v. Chertoff
as 1:2007cv00517
Plaintiff:
Semen Tetruashvili
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jain et al v Gonzalez et al
as 1:2007cv00482
Plaintiff:
Tarkeshwari Sharma
Petitioner:
Anurag Jain
Defendant:
Emilio T Gonzalez, Alberto R Gonzales and Michael Chertoff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Arroyo v. Chertoff
as 1:2007cv00480
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff
Plaintiff:
Vincent Arroyo and Vincent Arroyo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Arroyo v. Chertoff
as 2:2007cv00480
Plaintiff:
Vincent Arroyo and Vincent Arroyo
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Jain et al v Gonzalez et al
as 6:2007cv00482
Petitioner:
Anurag Jain and Anurag Jain
Plaintiff:
Tarkeshwari Sharma and Tarkeshwari Sharma
Defendant:
Emilio T Gonzalez, Alberto R Gonzales and Michael Chertoff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Kamal v. Chertoff
as 1:2007cv00473
Plaintiff:
Ibrahim Jasir Kamal
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Mappy v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv00402
Plaintiff:
Samuel Mappy
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff and Robert E Jolicoeur
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Arvizo v. Chertoff et al
as 6:2007cv00335
Plaintiff:
Esai Arvizo
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzales, Mario Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
