Cases 21 - 30 of 285
Severio v. Astrue
as 3:2013cv00058
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Dallas Roy Severio
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Simmons v. Astrue
as 3:2013cv00034
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Shantel H Simmons
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Melancon v. Astrue
as 3:2013cv00021
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Nancy Melancon
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Norman v. Astrue
as 3:2013cv00007
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Lula Norman
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Cornish v. Astrue
as 3:2013cv00002
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Robert Cornish
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Constantine v. Astrue
as 6:2012cv03072
Plaintiff:
Kevin Constantine
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Washington v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv03068
Plaintiff:
Nelson Washington
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Frank v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv02929
Plaintiff:
Monfra Frank
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Dickey v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv03036
Plaintiff:
Brenda Dickey
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Porter v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00768
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
United States Atty Donald J Cazayoux, Jr., U.S. ATTORNEY GEN Eric H. Holder, Jr. and Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Wright Porter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
