Supplemental Security Income Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 51 - 60 of 852
GALLO v. ASTRUE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv06460
Plaintiff: PATRICK J. GALLO
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
THOMAS v. ASTRUE et al
as 2:2012cv06439
Plaintiff: LAURA ANN THOMAS
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
ROBINS v. ASTRUE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv06440
Plaintiff: SALLY A ROBINS
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SALES v. ASTRUE
as 5:2012cv06378
Plaintiff: LUDMILA SOLANGEL SALES
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
CRUZ v. ASTRUE
as 2:2012cv06409
Plaintiff: MARIE A. CRUZ
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HANSEN v. ASTRUE
as 2:2012cv06387
Plaintiff: KRISTINA HANSEN
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
TAYLOR v. ASTRUE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv06323
Plaintiff: ROBERT L. TAYLOR
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
JONES v. ASTRUE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv06320
Plaintiff: KIM D. JONES
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
RACINE v. ASTRUE
as 2:2012cv06211
Plaintiff: THERESA RACINE
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
LEWIS v. ASTRUE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv06186
Plaintiff: SHAREE LEWIS
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?