Cases 51 - 60 of 2,163
FILING ERROR
as 3:2013cv00011
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Patricia Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Mendoza v. Astrue
as 3:2013cv00012
Defendant:
Cmr. Social Security Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
April Mendoza
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Alvarado v. Astrue
as 3:2013cv00010
Plaintiff:
Jose Alfredo Alvarado
Defendant:
Cmr. Social Security Michael J. Astrue
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Richard v. Astrue
as 5:2013xc00006
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Allen Richard
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jones v. Astrue
as 4:2013cv00034
Plaintiff:
Rachelle H. Jones
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Teyer v. Astrue
as 3:2013cv00001
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Plaintiff:
Michael Teyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Jordan v. Astrue
as 4:2013cv00035
Plaintiff:
Larry Jordan
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Southard v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00216
Plaintiff:
Thomas W. Southard
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gonzales v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv01222
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Rosa Gonzales
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Acero v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00502
Plaintiff:
Salvador Acero
Defendant:
Cmr. Social Security Michael J. Astrue
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
