Cases 41 - 50 of 105
Lete v. Astrue
as 2:2010cv02707
Miscellaneou:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Appellant:
Timothy J. Lete
Appellee:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Black v. Astrue
as 2:2010cv02526
Appellant:
Camille Cheri Black
Appellee:
Michael J. Astrue
Miscellaneou:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Boyd v. Astrue
as 2:2010cv02492
Appellant:
Latrice Nicole Boyd
Appellee:
Michael J. Astrue
Miscellaneou:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Grant v. Astrue et al
as 2:2010cv02437
Appellant:
Gewndolyn Denise Grant
Appellee:
Michael J. Astrue
Miscellaneou:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Johnson v. Astrue et al
as 1:2010cv01141
Plaintiff:
Shonda R. Johnson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue, Eric H. Holder, Jr. and Lawrence J. Laurenzi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Reeves v. Astrue et al
as 1:2010cv01069
Plaintiff:
Spencer Dee Reeves
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue, Eric H. Holder, Jr. and Lawrence J. Laurenzi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hill v. Astrue
as 2:2010cv02193
Plaintiff:
Tracy D. Hill
Miscellaneou:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Johnson v. Astrue
as 2:2010cv02160
Appellant:
Clara Woodland Johnson
Appellee:
Michael J. Astrue
Miscellaneou:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Greer v. Astrue
as 2:2010cv02087
Appellant:
John Lee Greer
Miscellaneou:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Appellee:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
McCaslin v. Astrue et al
as 1:2010cv01006
Plaintiff:
Vivian Marie McCaslin
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue, Eric H. Holder, Jr. and Lawrence J. Laurenzi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
