Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-1739
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Michael Shakman, et al v. Clerk of Cook County
as 20-1828
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DARRYN JONES, RICHARD GRAMAROSSA, PAUL M. LURIE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
CLERK OF COOK COUNTY
Michael Shakman, et al v. International Brotherhood, et al
as 19-2772
Defendant:
CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL, RICHARD M. DALEY, J.B. PRITZKER, Governor of the State of Illinois and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NOREEN LANAHAN, PAUL M. LURIE, KENNETH AYERS and others
Appellant:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, LOCAL UNION NO. 700
Shakman v. Democratic Organization of Cook County
as 3:2014mc00023
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Shakman
Defendant:
Democratic Organization of Cook County
Crown v. City of Chicago
as 3:2014mc00022
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Shakman
Defendant:
Democratic Organization of Cook County
Shakman v. Democratic Organization of Cook County
as 3:2014mc00012
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Shakman
Defendant:
Democratic Organization of Cook County
Shakman v. Democratic Organization of Cook County
as 3:2014mc00013
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Shakman
Defendant:
Democratic Organization of Cook County
Shakman, et al v. Cook Co Democratic, et al
as 1:1969cv02145
Plaintiff:
Michael L Shakman , Paul M Lurie , Kenneth Ayers and others
Defendant:
Democratic Organization of Cook County, The , Democratic County Central Committee of Cook County, The , City of Chicago, The and others
Respondent:
Chgo, Cty of
Intervenor:
Chicago City Council Black Caucus , Alderman Ed Smith , County Municipal Employees, Supervisors, and Foremans Unions, Local Number 1001 and others
Claimant:
Lauren B. Simon and Gloria Melendez
Objector:
RICKEY COLEMAN
Movant:
Employees Various
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
