Cases 1 - 10 of 47
LEWIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015cv00500
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEWIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, JANET RENO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOURNE v. MUKASEY
as 1:2009cv01724
Plaintiff:
ROBERT M. BOURNE
Defendant:
MICHAEL MUKASEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER et al v. HEINEMAN et al
as 1:2009cv00578
Plaintiff:
CHARLES C. MILLER, HAROLD EDMUND STONIER and DALE SCOTT HEINEMAN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MICHAEL MUKASEY, HARLEY LAPPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEE v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2009cv00385
Plaintiff:
PAUL LEE
Defendant:
MICHAEL MUKASEY, SHARON L. POTTER and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
HEINEMAN et al v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2009cv00328
Plaintiff:
DALE SCOTT HEINEMAN and KIRK F. JOHNSON
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY LAPPIN, LINDA SANDERS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
PARTOVI v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2009cv00068
Petitioner:
ALI PARTOVI
Respondent:
MICHAEL MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF and KATRINA KANE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
DRAPEAU v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2009cv00067
Petitioner:
BERNARD J. DRAPEAU, JR.
Respondent:
MICHAEL MUKASEY, HARLEY LAPPIN and BLAKE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
COCHRAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2008cv02156
Petitioner:
LARRY COCHRAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, MICHAEL MUKASEY and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MARKS v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2008cv02131
Plaintiff:
ANTOLIN ANDREW MARKS
Defendant:
MICHAEL MUKASEY and JOHN P. TORRES
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BELMONTE v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2008cv02132
Plaintiff:
MANUEL BELMONTE
Defendant:
MICHAEL MUKASEY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MICHAEL CHERTOFF and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
