Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Glendale Memorial Hospital and Health Center v. Leavitt
as 2:2008cv01747
Plaintiff:
Glendale Memorial Hospital and Health Center
Defendant:
Michael O Leavitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Citrus Valley Medical Center, Inc. v. Michael O Leavitt
as 2:2008cv01078
Plaintiff:
Citrus Valley Medical Center, Inc.
Defendant:
Michael O Leavitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Paul Messer et al v. US Dept of Health and Human Services et al
as 8:2007cv01444
Plaintiff:
Paul Messer and Dorothy Calabrese
Defendant:
US Dept of Health and Human Services and Michael O Leavitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Whitaker Wellness Institute Medical Clinic v. Paulson et al
as 8:2007cv00905
Plaintiff:
Whitaker Wellness Institute Medical Clinic, Whitaker Wellness Institute Medical Clinic and Whitaker Wellness Institute Medical Clinic
Defendant:
Henry M Paulson, U S Department of the Treasury, Michael O Leavitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Rehabilitation Institute At Santa Barbara v. Michael O Leavitt
as 2:2007cv03808
Plaintiff:
Rehabilitation Institute At Santa Barbara and Rehabilitation Institute At Santa Barbara
Defendant:
Michael O Leavitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
County of Los Angeles v. Michael O Leavitt
as 2:2007cv03437
Plaintiff:
County of Los Angeles
Defendant:
Michael O Leavitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Maria Isabel Tubera Del Rosario et al v. Michael O Leavitt et al
as 2:2007cv00334
Plaintiff:
Maria Isabel Tubera Del Rosario and Rhoneil Opulencia Del Rosario
Defendant:
Michael O Leavitt, Kenneth P Moritsugu, Julie Louise Gerberding and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
