Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Bradberry v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co. et al
as 1:2023cv09440
Plaintiff:
David Bradberry
Defendant:
Abercrombie & Fitch Co., Michael S. Jeffries, Matthew Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
The City of Plantation Police Officers' Employees' Retirement System v. Jeffries et al
as 2:2014cv01380
Plaintiff:
The City of Plantation Police Officers' Employees' Retirement System
Defendant:
Michael S Jeffries, James B. Bachmann, Bonnie R Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert Ross, et al v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
as 09-4028
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ROSS, Individually and on Behalf of all Others Simarly Situated
Respondent - Appellee:
THE CITY OF DEARBORN HEIGHTS ACT OF 345 POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Petitioner - Appellant:
ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO., DIANE CHANG, DAVID L. LEINO and others
The Booth Family Trust, et al v. Michael Jeffries, et al
as 09-3443
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THE BOOTH FAMILY TRUST, Charles Federman, Trustee, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant, Abercrombie & Fitch and ALFRED FREED
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL S. JEFFRIES, ROBERT S. SINGER, RUSSELL M. GERTMENIAN and others
Chu v. Gertmenian et al
as 2:2005cv01084
Interested Party:
Gianetti Investor Group
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Chu
Defendant:
Russell M. Gertmenian, Archie M. Griffin, Allan A. Tuttle and others
Petitioner:
Alfred Freed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Freed v. Jeffries et al
as 2:2005cv00998
Interested Party:
Gianetti Investor Group
Plaintiff:
Alfred Freed
Defendant:
Michael S Jeffries, Robert S. Singer, James B. Bachmann and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Kemp v. Gertmenian et al
as 2:2005cv00964
Interested Party:
Gianetti Investor Group
Plaintiff:
Robert Kemp
Defendant:
Russell M. Gertmenian, Archie M. Griffin, Allan A. Tuttle and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
