Cases 1 - 6 of 6
United States ex rel. Tracy v. Emigration Improvement Dist., et al
as 21-4143
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX. REL. MARK CHRISTOPHER TRACY
Defendant / Appellee:
EMIGRATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, a Utah Special Service District, FRED A. SMOLKA, an individual, MICHAEL HUGHES, an individual, AKA Michael Scott Hughes and others
Not Yet Classified:
JENNIFER HAWKES and SIMPLIFI COMPANY
United States ex rel. Tracy v. Emigration Improvement Dist., et al
as 21-4059
Defendant / Appellee:
R. STEVE CREAMER, an individual, JOE SMOLKA, an individual, DAVID BRADFORD, an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX. REL. MARK CHRISTOPHER TRACY
United States ex rel. Tracy v. Emigration Improvement Dist., et al
as 19-4021
Defendant:
R. STEVE CREAMER, an individual, JOE SMOLKA, an individual, CITY DEVELOPMENT, a Utah corporation and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID BRADFORD, an individual, ERIC HAWKES, an individual, FRED A. SMOLKA, an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX. REL. MARK CHRISTOPHER TRACY
United States ex rel. Tracy v. Emigration Improvement Dist., et al
as 19-4022
Defendant:
KENNETH WILDE, an individual, AQUA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC., a Utah corporation, THE BOYER COMPANY, a Utah company and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL HUGHES, an individual, AKA Michael Scott Hughes, LYNN HALES, an individual, ERIC HAWKES, an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX. REL. MARK CHRISTOPHER TRACY
Undetermined:
CHRISTENSEN & JENSEN, P.C.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00805
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007mc00860
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
