Cases 1 - 10 of 10
SIMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv23897
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SIMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SIMS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13091
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SIMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sims et al v. Inland Marine Service, Inc.
as 5:2022cv00040
Plaintiff:
Michael Sims and Allen Sims
Defendant:
Inland Marine Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104 Marine Personal Injury - Jones Act
SIMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv66860
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SIMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv11269
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SIMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv12679
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SIMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv49335
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SIMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv33228
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW MICHAEL SIMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv79027
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SIMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sims v. American Cystoscope Makers, Inc.
as 1:1978cv01282
Plaintiff:
Michael Sims
Defendant:
American Cystoscope Makers, Inc.
Interested_party:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
