Cases 11 - 19 of 19
DOE et al v. POMPEO et al
as 1:2020cv00065
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE, JOHN DOE and MARY DOE
Defendant:
MIKE POMPEO, CHAD WOLF, KEN CUCCINELLI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
SHEIKH et al v. POMPEO et al
as 1:2020cv00011
Defendant:
MIKE POMPEO, JOHN DOE, Mr. CARL C. RISCH and others
Plaintiff:
UMAR HAMID SHEIKH and SANA TABASSAM SAGHIR
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
IRAM et al v. POMPEO et al
as 1:2019cv03314
Plaintiff:
JAVARIA IRAM and QAISAR RASHID
Defendant:
MIKE POMPEO, ROBERT SILBERSTEIN and CHRISTOPHER WRAY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
BEBERMAN v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2019cv03115
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE and MIKE POMPEO
Plaintiff:
JULIE BEBERMAN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
ROGERS v. POMPEO
as 1:2019cv02141
Plaintiff:
RYLAND WILCOX ROGERS
Defendant:
MIKE POMPEO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
ZAMANI et al v. POMPEO et al
as 1:2019cv00970
Respondent:
PHILIP FRAYNE, MIKE POMPEO, CARL C. RISCH and others
Petitioner:
BEHNAM SALEHI and SARA ZAMANI
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
MOHAMADI et al v. POMPEO et al
as 1:2019cv00953
Respondent:
MIKE POMPEO, ROBERT W. THOMAS, CARL C. RISCH and others
Petitioner:
NAZANIN SHABANI and HAMID MOHAMADI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
HILL v. POMPEO
as 1:2018cv02518
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY HILL
Defendant:
Secretary MIKE POMPEO and MIKE POMPEO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, et al v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD et al
as 1:2011cv01629
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS , COALITION FOR A DEMOCRATIC WORKPLACE , NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION, INC. and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD , MARK PEARCE , CRAIG BECKER and others
Amicu:
JOHN KLINE , UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES , DAN BURTON and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
