Cases 1 - 10 of 46
The People of the State of Michigan v. FERC
as 25-1285
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Petitioner:
People of the State of Michigan
Intervenor:
Consumers Energy Company, Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc., Ameren Services Company, agent of Union Electric Company, d/b/a Ameren Missouri and others
Clean Wisconsin, et al v. FERC
as 25-1264
Petitioner:
Clean Wisconsin, Natural Resources Defense Council and Sierra Club
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Entergy Services, LLC, on behalf of the Entergy Operating Companies, Louisiana Public Service Commission, MISO Transmission Owners and others
Amicus Curiae:
Public Utility Commission of Texas
Advanced Energy United, et al v. FERC
as 25-1266
Petitioner:
Advanced Energy United, American Clean Power Association, Clean Grid Alliance and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Louisiana Public Service Commission, Entergy Services, LLC, on behalf of the Entergy Operating Companies, MISO Transmission Owners and others
Amicus Curiae:
Public Utility Commission of Texas
Keith Kessler, et al v. Minnesota Power
as 25-2959
Plaintiff:
Keith Kessler, Deanna Kessler, Megan Kessler and others
Defendant:
Minnesota Power, a Division of ALLETE, Inc.
Public Service Electric and Gas Company, et al v. FERC
as 25-1165
Petitioner:
Public Service Electric and Gas Company, PSEG Power LLC and PSEG Energy Resources & Trade LLC
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Ameren Services Company, agent of Union Electric Company, d/b/a Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois Company, d/b/a Ameren Illinois, Ameren Transmission Company of Illinois, Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation, City Water, Light & Power and others
MISO Transmission Owners, et al v. FERC
as 25-1115
Petitioner:
MISO Transmission Owners, ALLETE, Inc., for its operating division Minnesota Power (and its subsidiary Superior Water, L&P), Ameren Services Company, agent of Union Electric Company, d/b/a Ameren Missouri, agent of Ameren Illinois Company, d/b/a Ameren Illinois, agent of Ameren Transmission Company of Illinois and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Amicus Curiae:
New England Power Company, d/b/a National Grid, Central Maine Power Company, Eversource Energy Service Company, on behalf of The Connecticut Light and Power Company, NSTAR Electric Company, and Public Service Company of New Hampshire and others
Intervenor:
Versant Power, f/k/a Emera Maine
Louisiana Public Service Commission v. FERC
as 25-1069
Petitioner:
Louisiana Public Service Commission
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Association of Businesses Advocating Tariff Equity, Coalition of MISO Transmission Customers, Illinois Industrial Energy Consumers and others
MISO Transmission Owners, et al v. FERC
as 25-1045
Petitioner:
MISO Transmission Owners, ALLETE, Inc., for its operating division Minnesota Power (and its subsidiary Superior Water, L&P), Ameren Services Company, agent of Union Electric Company, d/b/a Ameren Missouri, agent of Ameren Illinois Company, d/b/a Ameren Illinois, agent of Ameren Transmission Company of Illinois and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Southwestern Electric Cooperative, Inc., Resale Power Group of Iowa, Rural Electric Convenience Cooperative and others
MISO Transmission Owners, et al v. FERC
as 24-1136
Petitioner:
MISO Transmission Owners, Ameren Services Company, Union Electric Company, d/b/a Ameren Missouri and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
ALLETE, et al v. EPA, et al
as 23-2789
Petitioner:
ALLETE, Inc., doing business as Minnesota Power, Northern States Power Co. - Minnesota, doing business as Xcel Energy, Great River Energy and others
Respondent:
United States Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
