Cases 31 - 40 of 84
MAYHUE v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86919
Plaintiff:
TRUMAN JAMES MAYHUE
Defendant:
3M, AK STEEL CORPORATION, MT. VERNON MILLS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
GILBERT v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86909
Plaintiff:
RICHARD Y. GILBERT
Defendant:
3M, AK STEEL CORPORATION, MT. VERNON MILLS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
JOBE v. A. W. CHESTERTON et al
as 5:2008cv87059
Plaintiff:
JEFFERSON D. JOBE and JEFFERSON D. JOBE
Defendant:
A. W. CHESTERTON, CERTAINTEED CORP., DURAMETALLIC CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HENRY v. PLASTICS ENGINEERING CO. (PLENCO) et al
as 2:2008cv87123
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. HENRY and JOHN W. HENRY
Defendant:
PLASTICS ENGINEERING CO. (PLENCO), CYTEC INDUSTRIES, INC., OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
JONES v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86914
Plaintiff:
LILLY JONES
Defendant:
3M, AK STEEL CORPORATION, MT. VERNON MILLS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
CHISOLM v. INGERSOLL RAND COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv85759
Plaintiff:
THOMAS A. CHISOLM
Defendant:
INGERSOLL RAND COMPANY, MISSISSIPPI RUBBER & SPECIALTY COMPANY, COASTAL RUBBER & GASKET COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DAVIS v. A.W. CHESTERTON et al
as 5:2008cv87055
Plaintiff:
WILLIE LEE DAVIS and WILLIE LEE DAVIS
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON, CERTAINTEED CORP., DURAMETALLIC CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
KENDRIX v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86916
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR LEE KENDRIX
Defendant:
3M, AK STEEL CORPORATION, MT. VERNON MILLS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SPENCE v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86922
Plaintiff:
LINDA SPENCE
Defendant:
3M, AK STEEL CORPORATION, MT. VERNON MILLS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WATSON v. GARLOCK, INC et al
as 2:2008cv87121
Plaintiff:
HENRY LEE WATSON
Defendant:
GARLOCK, INC, MISSISSIPPI RUBBER & SPECIALTY COMPANY, MCCORD GASKET COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
