Cases 1 - 10 of 12
HOPKINS v. KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN et al
as 2:2021cv03528
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOPKINS
Defendant:
KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN, LYDIA I BEEBE, LU M CORDOVA and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
O'ROURKE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv52797
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL J. O'ROURKE
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HUDDLESTON et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv48664
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL J. HUDDLESTON , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SCHAFER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET. AL.
as 5:2011cv45569
Plaintiff:
MITCHEL J. SCHAFER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET. AL.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BORSA v. SINCLAIR REFINING COMPANY
as 2:2010cv57582
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL J. BORSA
Defendant:
SINCLAIR REFINING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
BORSA v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2010cv42234
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL J BORSA
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
BORSA v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2010cv42045
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL J BORSA
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
BORSA v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2010cv41837
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL J BORSA
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
MITCH'S AUTO SERVICE CENTER, INC. et al v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 2:2010cv03843
Plaintiff:
MITCH'S AUTO SERVICE CENTER, INC. , MITCHELL J. HARTKA and CAREN HARTKA
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Product Liability
MITCH'S AUTO SERVICE CENTER, INC. et al v. STATE AUTOMOBILE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2010cv03413
Plaintiff:
MITCH'S AUTO SERVICE CENTER, INC. and MITCHELL J. HARTKA
Defendant:
STATE AUTOMOBILE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
