Cases filed in California
Cases 41 - 50 of 124
Ronco v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv03078
Plaintiff: Patricia Ronco
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Martich v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv03079
Plaintiff: John Martich and John Martich
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kelley v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv03082
Plaintiff: Allen Kelley
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Cintron v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv02957
Plaintiff: Oscar Cintron
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Coyle v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2007cv02955
Plaintiff: Peter Coyle and Peter Coyle
Defendant: AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Lauricella
as 3:2007cv02953
Plaintiff: Timothy J. Lauricella, Timothy J. Lauricella, Timothy J. Lauricella and others
Defendant: AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Long v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv02916
Plaintiff: Tammy Long and Tammy Long
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Rywelski v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv02935
Plaintiff: Christopher C Rywelski and Christopher C Rywelski
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Mulvey et al v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv02937
Plaintiff: Martha Mulvey
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Griffith v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv02933
Plaintiff: Judith Griffith
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?