Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Platform 10, LLC v. Battle Mountain Band of the Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians
as 3:2020cv00238
Defendant:
Battle Mountain Band of the Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians and Battle Mountain Band of the Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians of Nevada
Plaintiff:
Platform 10, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Battle Mountain Band of the Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians v. United States Bureau of Land Management et al
as 3:2016cv00268
Plaintiff:
Battle Mountain Band of the Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians
Intervenor Defendant:
Carlin Resources, LLC
Defendant:
Jill C. Silvey and United States Bureau of Land Management
Movant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
South Fork Livestock Partnership
as 3:2015cv00066
Defendant:
Rich Adams, Bryan L. Bowker, Davis Gonzales and others
Plaintiff:
South Fork Livestock Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians et al v. United States Departement of the Interior et al
as 3:2011cv00762
Plaintiff:
Paula Brady, Bryan Cassadore, Davis Gonzalez and others
Defendant:
Larry Echo Hawk, William Knight, Sim Malotte and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
The Housing Authority of the Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians et al v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 3:2008cv00626
Plaintiff:
The Housing Authority of the Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians and The Housing Authority of the Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians
Defendant:
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Steve Preston, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Paula Blunt, General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
