Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Moody v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00532
Plaintiff:
Randy Moody
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moody et al v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00838
Defendant:
Getinge AB, Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC and Atrium Medical Corporation
Plaintiff:
Michael Moody and Laura Moody
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moody v. PennyMac Loan Services, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00185
Plaintiff:
Dana E. Moody
Defendant:
PennyMac Holdings, LLC, PennyMac Loan Services, LLC and PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust Holdings I, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Moody v. PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
as 1:2016cv00025
Plaintiff:
Dana E. Moody
Defendant:
PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Moody v. PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
as 1:2016cv00021
Plaintiff:
Dana E. Moody
Defendant:
PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Moody v. PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
as 1:2016cv00022
Plaintiff:
Dana E. Moody
Defendant:
PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Moody v. PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
as 1:2016cv00024
Plaintiff:
Dana E. Moody
Defendant:
PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Moody v. US Social Security Administration, Commissioner et al
as 1:2011cv00488
Plaintiff:
Frederick Warren Moody
Defendant:
US Social Security Administration - Notice Only (Court Use Only) and US Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Moody v. Cold Springs RV Corporation
as 1:2011cv00114
Defendant:
Cold Springs RV Corporation
Plaintiff:
Dana Moody
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
