Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC et al v. Kolokoff
as 1:2012cv23139
Plaintiff:
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney FA Notes Holdings LLC
Defendant:
Lloyd Kolokoff
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. Cypress et al
as 1:2012cv22439
Plaintiff:
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida
Defendant:
Billy Cypress, Dexter Wayne Lehtinen, Guy A. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Cook v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC et al
as 6:2011cv01952
Plaintiff:
Michael Cook
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney FA Notes Holding LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv62476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv61377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Seniors Civil Liberties Association, Inc. v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC
as 8:2011cv00745
Plaintiff:
Seniors Civil Liberties Association, Inc.
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ODOM v. MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC et al
as 3:2011cv00075
Plaintiff:
WESLEY ODOM
Defendant:
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC and CITIGROUP INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Sampson v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC
as 0:2010cv62190
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Cary Sampson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Solomon v. Morgan Stanley et al
as 1:2010cv23137
Plaintiff:
Apostle Solomon
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC, Gail Atterman and Adam Rosenfeld
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
