Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Dixon v. Adams
as 23-799
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Shaw-Nae Dixon, Thomas Casatelli, Jeanette Rivera and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Eric Adams and City of New York
Dixon et al v. DeBlasio et al
as 1:2021cv05090
Plaintiff:
Shaw-Nae Dixon, Thomas Casatelli, Jeanette Rivera and others
Defendant:
Bill DeBlasio and City of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
National Association of Tobacco Outlets, Inc. et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv00577
Plaintiff:
National Association of Tobacco Outlets, Inc. , New York Association of Convenience Stores , Bodega Association of the United States, Inc. and others
Defendant:
City of New York , New York City Council , New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene and others
Amicu:
American Heart Association , American Legacy Foundation (Legacy) , American Lung Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Community Health Care Associat v. New York State Department of H
as 13-3454
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Community Health Care Association of New York, Anthony L. Jordan Health Center, Community Health Center of Buffalo, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
New York State Department of Health, State of New York and Does, 1-20
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Richard F. Daines, Medical Doctor, in his official capacity as Commissioner and Nirav R. Shah, Medical Doctor, in his official capacity as Commissioner
Community Health Care Associat v. New York State Department of H
as 13-3332
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Community Health Care Association of New York, Anthony L. Jordan Health Center, Brooklyn Plaza Medical Center, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
New York State Department of Health, Richard F. Daines, Medical Doctor, in his official capacity as Commissioner, Nirav R. Shah, Medical Doctor, in his official capacity as Commissioner and others
Community Health Care Associat v. New York State Department of
as 13-991
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Community Health Care Association of New York, Anthony L. Jordan Health Center, Bedford Stuyvesant Family Health Center, Inc. and others
Defendant:
State of New York, New York State Department of Health and Does 1-20
Defendant - Appellant:
M.D. Richard F. Daines, in his official capacity as Commissioner and M.D. Nirav R. Shah, in his official capacity as Commissioner
Community Health Care Associat v. New York State Department of H
as 13-771
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Community Health Care Association of New York, Anthony L. Jordan Health Center, Bedford Stuyvesant Family Health Center, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Does 1-20
Defendant - Appellee:
M.D. Richard F. Daines, in his official capacity as Commissioner, New York State Department of Health and State of New York
New York Association of Convenience Stores et al v. Village of Haverstraw, New York et al
as 1:2012cv05013
Plaintiff:
New York Association of Convenience Stores , Lorillard Tobacco Company , R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company and others
Defendant:
Village of Haverstraw, New York, Village of Haverstraw Building Department, Haverstraw Town Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1331
New York Association of Convenience Stores et al v. Village of Haverstraw, New York et al
as 7:2012cv05013
Plaintiff:
New York Association of Convenience Stores , Lorillard Tobacco Company , R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company and others
Defendant:
Village of Haverstraw, New York, Village of Haverstraw Building Department, Haverstraw Town Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1331
23-34 94th St. Grocery Corp. v. New York City Board of Health
as 11-91
Plaintiff - Appellee:
23-94th St. Grocery Corp., Kissena Blvd. Convenience Store, Inc., New York Association of Convenience Stores and others
Defendant - Appellant:
New York City Board of Health, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York City Department of Consumer Affairs and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
