Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lanzet v. Vical Incorporated et al
as 1:2019cv07528
Defendant:
Richard M. Beleson, Gary A. Lyons, Robert C. Merton and others
Plaintiff:
David M. Lanzet
Jin v. Vical Incorporated et al
as 1:2019cv07451
Defendant:
Vijay B. Samant, Gary A. Lyons, R. Gordon Douglas and others
Plaintiff:
Fuzi Jin
Ramnath et al v. Qudian Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv09741
Defendant:
Stifel, Nicolaus and Company, Incorporated, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., China International Capital Corporation Hong Kong Securities Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Anand Ramnath, Darwin Sutanto, Carlos Maia and others
Petitioner:
Kaib Global Fund LP, Joel Fu, Pak Cheung Hong and Siu Ling Li and others
Lead Plaintiff:
Alan B. Hertz and Alan Hertz Family 2012 Trust
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Morrow v. Alltran Financial, LP d/b/a United Recovery Systems, LP
as 1:2017cv03346
Plaintiff:
James Morrow
Defendant:
Alltran Financial, LP d/b/a United Recovery Systems, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Morrow v. Monarch Recovery Management, Inc.
as 1:2016cv04066
Defendant:
Monarch Recovery Management, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Morrow
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Morrow v. County of Nassau
as 2:2015cv04793
Defendant:
County of Nassau
Plaintiff:
Ranjon Morrow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Morrow v. Diversified Consultants, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00421
Plaintiff:
Marrissa Morrow
Defendant:
Diversified Consultants, Inc. and Doe 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Morrow v. Commission on Judical Conduct et al
as 1:2007cv10271
Plaintiff:
Charles Morrow
Defendant:
Commission on Judical Conduct, Robert H. Tembeckjian, Raoul Lionel Felder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
