Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 20
The Indirect Purchaser Settlem, et al v. Samsung Electronics Company Lt, et al
as 14-16412
: In re: DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: THE INDIRECT PURCHASER SETTLEMENT CLASS and THE GOVERNMENT PURCHASER PLAINTIFF CLASSES
Objector - Appellant: SHANNON CASHION, W. CHRISTOPHER MCDONOUGH and KELLY KRESS
Defendant - Appellee: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY LTD., WINBOND ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG and others
The Indirect Purchaser Settlem, et al v. Samsung Electronics Company Lt, et al
as 14-16361
: In re: DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: THE INDIRECT PURCHASER SETTLEMENT CLASS and THE GOVERNMENT PURCHASER PLAINTIFF CLASSES
Objector - Appellant: DAVID C. MARLOW
Defendant - Appellee: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY LTD., WINBOND ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG and others
The Indirect Purchaser Settlem, et al v. Samsung Electronics Company Lt, et al
as 14-16364
: In re: DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: THE INDIRECT PURCHASER SETTLEMENT CLASS and THE GOVERNMENT PURCHASER PLAINTIFF CLASSES
Objector - Appellant: BARBARA COCHRAN, JAMES GLASE and BRYAN MARCUS
Defendant - Appellee: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY LTD., WINBOND ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG and others
The Indirect Purchaser Settlem, et al v. Samsung Electronics Company Lt, et al
as 14-16360
: In re: DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: THE INDIRECT PURCHASER SETTLEMENT CLASS and THE GOVERNMENT PURCHASER PLAINTIFF CLASSES
Objector - Appellant: NORMAN D. PALMER and ESTATE OF FERN COOK
Defendant - Appellee: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY LTD., WINBOND ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG and others
The Indirect Purchaser Settlem, et al v. Samsung Electronics Company Lt, et al
as 14-16342
: In re: DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: THE INDIRECT PURCHASER SETTLEMENT CLASS and THE GOVERNMENT PURCHASER PLAINTIFF CLASSES
Objector - Appellant: SEAN KENNETH HULL, RAYMOND FRANCIS CAMPBELL and SUPEROXYGEN, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY LTD., WINBOND ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG and others
Kindt et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
as 3:2007cv04938
Plaintiff: Andrew Kindt, Andrew Kindt, Andrew Kindt and others
Defendant: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Hynix Semiconductor , Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Westell Technologies Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv04944
Plaintiff: Westell Technologies Inc., Westell Technologies Inc., Westell Technologies Inc. and others
Defendant: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Hynix Semiconductor, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Young v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd et al
as 3:2007cv02286
Plaintiff: Laura Young, Laura Young, Laura Young and others
Defendant: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Hynix Semiconductor, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Skorstad v. Samsung Electonics Co Ltd et al
as 3:2007cv02228
Plaintiff: Ryan Skorstad, Ryan Skorstad and Ryan Skorstad
Defendant: Samsung Electonics Co Ltd, Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Hynix Semiconductor , Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
McClellan-Chambers et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd et al
as 3:2007cv01823
Plaintiff: Jean McClellan-Chambers, Jean McClellan-Chambers, Jean McClellan-Chambers and others
Defendant: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Hynix Semiconductor, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?