Cases 1 - 10 of 334
Cheng v. United States of America
as 24-1131
Plaintiff:
SHENG-WEN CHENG, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, C.O. ANDRE HICKSON, Warden JEAN RENE and others
Murphy Medical Associates, LLC v. Yale University
as 24-944
Plaintiff:
MURPHY MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, LLC, DIAGNOSTIC AND MEDICAL SPECIALISTS OF GREENWICH, LLC and STEVEN A.R. MURPHY, M.D.
Defendant:
YALE UNIVERSITY and YALE HEALTH PLAN
Murphy v. Onondaga County
as 24-900
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MURPHY
Defendant:
ONONDAGA COUNTY, ONONDAGA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CARL HUMMEL, all individually and in their capacities as employees of Onondaga County and the Onondaga County Sheriff's Department and others
Murphy v. Onondaga County
as 24-904
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MURPHY
Defendant:
ONONDAGA COUNTY, ONONDAGA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CARL HUMMEL, all individually and in their capacities as employees of Onondaga County and the Onondaga County Sheriff's Department and others
DiPierro v. New York State Unified Court System
as 24-571
Plaintiff:
PAUL DIPIERRO and MARIE ZWEIG
Defendant:
NEW YORK STATE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM, NEW YORK OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION, JUSTIN BARRY and others
Traylor v. Pacciuco LLC
as 24-691
Plaintiff:
SYLVESTER TRAYLOR
Defendant:
TOWN OF WATERFORD, LAW OFFICE OF LLOYD LANGHAMMER, LLC, PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION and others
Murphy v. City of Elmira
as 24-660
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. MURPHY
Defendant:
OTTAVIO CAMPANELLA, MATTHEW BUZZETTI, TIMOTHY OVERLY and others
United States of America v. Murphy
as 24-404
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RAYSHAWN NIBLACK and SHERROD MURPHY
Roy v. Narayen et al
as 1:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
Anand Roy
Defendant:
Shantanu Narayen, John Murphy, Daniel Durn and others
Kanno v. Aldag, Jr. et al
as 1:2023cv10934
Plaintiff:
Kunihiko Kanno
Defendant:
Edward K. Aldag, Jr., J. Kevin Hanna, R. Steven Hamner and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
