Other Statutes Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 47
MYL Litigation Recovery I LLC v. Mylan N.V. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01799
Plaintiff: MYL Litigation Recovery I LLC
Defendant: John D. Sheehan, Rajiv Malik, Paul B. Campbell and others
In re Novartis and Par Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv04361
Defendant: Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Drogueria Betances, LLC, H-E-B LP, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp., and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Law Enforcement Health Benefits Inc., Turlock Irrigation District, UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund
Respondent: Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
In Re: Restasis (Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion) Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2018md02819
Defendant: Restasis (Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff: Allergan, Inc., 1199SEIU Greater New York Benefit Fund, 1199SEIU Licensed Practical Nurses Welfare Fund and others
In Re: In Re: Restasis (Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion) Antitrust Litigation
Interested Party: Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
Petitioner: Akorn Inc.
Cause Of Action: Antitrust Litigation
Arkansas et al v. Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01180
Plaintiff: State of Arkansas , District of Columbia , State of Missouri and others
Defendant: Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc., Citron Pharma, LLC, Heritage Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Antitrust Litigation
New York City, Local 246, S.E.I.U., Welfare Benefits Fund et al v. Lannett Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02467
Plaintiff: New York City, Local 246, S.E.I.U., Welfare Benefits Fund , New York City, Local 246, S.E.I.U., Retirees Welfare Benefits Fund , Teamsters Local 237 Welfare Fund and others
Defendant: Lannett Company, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sandoz, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Sergeants Benevolent Association Health & Welfare Fund v. Endo International PLC et al
as 1:2017cv02355
Plaintiff: Sergeants Benevolent Association Health & Welfare Fund
Defendant: Endo International PLC, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees District Council 37 Health & Security Plan v. Mylan, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01164
Plaintiff: American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees District Council 37 Health & Security Plan
Defendant: Mylan, Inc., Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Taro Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Sergeants Benevolent Association Health & Welfare Fund v. Actavis Elizabeth, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00980
Plaintiff: Sergeants Benevolent Association Health & Welfare Fund , American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees District Council 37 Health & Security Plan
Defendant: Actavis Elizabeth, LLC, Breckenridge Pharmaceutical, Inc., Heritage Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Antitrust Litigation
American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees District Council 37 Health & Security Plan v. Actavis Elizabeth, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv01039
Plaintiff: American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees District Council 37 Health & Security Plan
Defendant: Actavis Elizabeth, LLC, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
MSPA Claims 1, LLC, et al v. Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00144
Plaintiff: MSPA Claims 1, LLC , MAO-MSO RECOVERY, LLC. a Delaware entity , MAO-MSO RECOVERY II, LLC, a Delaware entity
Defendant: Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc., Citron Pharma, LLC, Heritage Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?