Cases 1 - 7 of 7
TANGLE, INC. v. THE INDIVIDUALS, CORPORATIONS, LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES, PARTNERSHIPS, AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A HERETO
as 0:2022cv62289
Plaintiff:
TANGLE, INC.
Defendant:
THE INDIVIDUALS, CORPORATIONS, LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES, PARTNERSHIPS, AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A HERETO, Anxin Xueyu Business Co., Ltd. (1), Dongguan Everest Technology Co., Ltd. (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
EnchantedMob, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv04455
Plaintiff:
EnchantedMob, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Wuhan Tknow Technology Co., Ltd., Wuhan Tknow Toys Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
FAMA Technology, Inc. v. Nasa Machine Tools, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00688
Plaintiff:
FAMA Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
Nasa Machine Tools, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Robert Lee Manning v. NASA et al
as 2:2013cv01137
Defendant:
Does, David J Kappos, NASA and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Manning, Jr
Robert Lee Manning v. NASA et al
as 2:2013cv00571
Defendant:
Does, David J Kappos, NASA and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Manning, Jr.
Gharb v. Rockwell Automation et al
as 1:2011cv00405
Plaintiff:
Samy Gharb
Defendant:
Rockwell Automation, Keith Nosbusch, Douglas M. Hagerman and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
v. Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv20819
Plaintiff:
Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Nasa Electronics Corporation, World International Trading, Inc., World International Trading, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
