Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Arandell Corporation, et al v. Xcel Energy Inc., et al
as 22-3279
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ARANDELL CORPORATION, SARGENTO FOODS INC., BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION and others
Defendant / Appellant:
XCEL ENERGY INC., NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY, E PRIME, INC. and others
Defendant:
WILLIAMS MERCHANT SERVICES COMPANY, INC. and WILLIAMS GAS MARKETING, INC., formerly known as WILLIAMS POWER COMPANY, INC.
Xcel Energy Inc., et al v. Arandell Corporation, et al
as 22-8008
Petitioner:
XCEL ENERGY INC., NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY, E PRIME, INC. and others
Respondent:
ARANDELL CORPORATION, SARGENTO FOODS, INC., BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION and others
Arandell Corporation, et al v. GenOn Energy, Incorporated, et al
as 18-20619
Appellant:
ARANDELL CORPORATION, BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION, CARTHAGE COLLEGE and others
Appellee:
GENON ENERGY, INCORPORATED and RRI ENERGY SERVICES, L.L.C.
Arandell Corporation, et al v. GenOn Energy, Incorporated, et al
as 18-90034
Petitioner:
ARANDELL CORPORATION, BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION, CARTHAGE COLLEGE and others
Respondent:
GENON ENERGY, INCORPORATED and RRI ENERGY SERVICES, L.L.C.
NewPage Wisconsin System, Inco, et al v. United Steel, Paper and Forest, et al
as 10-2887
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEWPAGE WISCONSIN SYSTEM, INCORPORATED and NPWSI RETIREE HEALTH PLAN, formerly known as SENA RETIREE HEALTH PLAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, WILLIAM CLENDENNING, individually, LAWRENCE BIERSTAKER, individually and others
Scott LeFebvre v. Sena Severance Pay Plan, et al
as 10-2362
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT LEFEBVRE
Defendant - Appellee:
SENA SEVERANCE PAY PLAN and NEWPAGE WISCONSIN SYSTEM, INCORPORATED
Melissa Reddinger v. Sena Severance Pay Plan, et al
as 10-2361
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELISSA J. REDDINGER
Defendant - Appellee:
SENA SEVERANCE PAY PLAN and NEWPAGE WISCONSIN SYSTEM, INCORPORATED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
