Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Perez v. Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P.
as 1:2023cv01778
Defendant:
Penske Truck Leasing CO. Limited Partnership Colorado, individually also known as Penske Truck Leasing CO. L.P. doing business as Penske Denver (7245-10) and Penske Truck Leasing CO. L.P.
Plaintiff:
Miguel Perez
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Westfield Insurance Company and Colorado Party Rentals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
David v. Party City Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv02160
Plaintiff:
Carolyn David
Defendant:
Party City Corporation and Arciterra Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Epipen (Epinephrine Injection, USP) Marketing, Sales Practices and Antitrust Litigation
as 2:2017md02785
Defendant:
Epipen (Epinephrine Injection, USP) Marketing, Sales Practices and Antitrust Litigation **COUNSEL: DO NOT ADD PARTIES.**, Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc., Mylan Specialty, LP and others
In Re:
Epipen (Epinephrine Injection, USP) Marketing, Sales Practices and Antitrust Litigation, Consumer Class Cases Plaintiffs, All Plaintiffs (for Lead/Liaison Counsel ONLY) and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Dollander, Lisa Vogel, April Sumner and others
Special Master:
Honorable Margaret R. Hinkle (Ret.)
Not Classified By Court:
Horizon Blue Cross and Blue Shield of New Jersey, Coventry Health Care, Elan Klein and others
Petitioner:
Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc., Amerigroup Corporation, Anthem, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
kaleo, Inc., MedImpact Healthcare Systems, Inc., Change Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 Multi-District Litigation
Towns v. Party City Corporation
as 1:2016cv00763
Plaintiff:
Susan Towns
Defendant:
Party City Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alarcon et al v. Amer Sports Company et al
as 1:2012cv00842
Plaintiff:
David Alarcon and Norma Alarcon
Defendant:
Amer Sports Company , Mavic Incorporated and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
