Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 124
United States of America v. Ryan
as 24-2529
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: LAMAR NOLAN RYAN
Ferreira v. Mayorkas et al
as 4:2024cv01820
Plaintiff: Daniel Gomes Ferreira
Defendant: Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Connie Nolan
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Char v. Tresch, et al.
as 24-868
Plaintiff: MARK ALAN CHAR
Defendant: MAURA TRESCH, RICHARD BANNER, DEANE HATAKEYAMA and others
Nolan v. Salmonsen, et al.
as 24-802
Petitioner: DONNIE NOLAN
Respondent: JIM SALMONSEN, GREEN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
Zilin Fang v. Connie Nolan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2024cv00300
Plaintiff: Zilin Fang
Defendant: Connie Nolan, Ur M Jaddou and Ur M. Jaddou
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05254
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00271
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Joseph Nolan v. Boston Medical Group Telemedicine Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2023cv00412
Plaintiff: Joseph Nolan
Defendant: Boston Medical Group Telemedicine Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Villalobos v. Garland
as 23-62
Petitioner: NOLAN JOSHUA VILLALOBOS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Xu Zhang et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2022cv09027
Plaintiff: XU ZHANG, XI WANG, YUELIN WANG and others
Defendant: USCIS, LOS ANDIRECTOR UR. M. JADDOU, CONNIE NOLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?