Cases 21 - 30 of 37
GMA Accessories, Inc. v. Charlotte Olympia Holdings, Ltd. et al
as 1:2017cv06049
Plaintiff:
GMA Accessories, Inc.
Defendant:
Charlotte Olympia Holdings, Ltd. , Nordstrom, Inc. , Bergdorf Goodman Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Tianhai Lace USA Inc v. Nordstrom, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01296
Plaintiff:
Tianhai Lace USA Inc
Defendant:
Nordstrom, Inc. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Klauber Brothers, Inc. v. Nordstrom, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv09260
Defendant:
Nordstrom, Inc., Jenny Yoo Collection, Inc. and DOES 1-10
Plaintiff:
Klauber Brothers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Dye v. Kate Spade & Company et al
as 1:2016cv05759
Plaintiff:
Mark Dye
Defendant:
Kate Spade & Company , Kate Spade, LLC , Macy's, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Lopez v. Nordstrom, Inc.
as 1:2016cv03194
Plaintiff:
Robert G. Lopez
Defendant:
Nordstrom, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Belfer Cosmetics, LLC v. Nordstrom, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01738
Plaintiff:
Belfer Cosmetics, LLC
Defendant:
Nordstrom Inc. and Erno Laszlo, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Erno Laszlo, Inc. and Nordstrom Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Belfer Cosmetics, LLC , Erno Laszlo, Inc. and Nordstrom Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Mara Hoffman, Inc. v. Big Buddha, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02196
Plaintiff:
Mara Hoffman, Inc.
Defendant:
Big Buddha, Inc. and Nordstrom, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
