Cases 1 - 7 of 7
NEWTON v. A.C. & S. INC. et al
as 2:2009cv72924
Plaintiff:
CONSTANCE A. NEWTON
Defendant:
A.C. & S. INC., AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
GARNETT et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC. et al
as 2:2009cv73577
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RICHARD GARNETT and BARBARA J. GARNETT
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL, ANCHOR PACKING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
GARNETT et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC. et al
as 2:2009cv73576
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RICHARD GARNETT and BARBARA J. GARNETT
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL, ANCHOR PACKING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WELLS et al v. A.C. & S. INC. et al
as 2:2007cv64529
Plaintiff:
BETTY WELLS, CONSTANCE A. NEWTON, KENNETH T. MARVEL and others
Defendant:
A.C. & S. INC., AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DOUGHERTY et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC. et al
as 2:2007cv63016
Plaintiff:
ALBERT VINCENT DOUGHERTY, WILLIAM RICHARD GARNETT, BARBARA J. GARNETT and others
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL, ANCHOR PACKING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MODLEY et al v. 20TH CENTURY GLOVE CORP. OF TEXAS et al
as 2:2007cv62874
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN JOSEPH MODLEY, FRANKLIN JOSEPH MODLEY, FRANKLIN JOSEPH MODLEY and others
Defendant:
20TH CENTURY GLOVE CORP. OF TEXAS, 20TH CENTURY GLOVE CORP. OF TEXAS, A.W. CHESTERTON CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
COOL et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP et al
as 2:2007cv60571
Plaintiff:
ROBERT COOL and DONNA COOL
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP, PITTSBURG CORNING CORPORATION, ACANDS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
