Cases 41 - 50 of 85
DISH Network L.L.C. et al v. Aracely Espinoza et al
as 5:2014cv00574
Plaintiff:
DISH Network L.L.C., EchoStar Technologies L.L.C. and NagraStar LLC
Defendant:
Aracely Espinoza and Josten Espinoza
DISH Network L.L.C., et al. v. Hoggard
as 1:2014cv00331
Plaintiff:
DISH Network L.L.C. , NagraStar LLC and EchoStar Technologies L.L.C.
Defendant:
Clayton Hoggard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dish Network LLC et al v. Tim Cooney
as 2:2013cv03953
Defendant:
Tim Cooney
Plaintiff:
Dish Network LLC, EchoStar Technologies LLC and Nagrastar LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03952
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dish Network LLC et al v. Samuel Popescu
as 2:2013cv03915
Plaintiff:
Dish Network LLC, EchoStar Technologies LLC and NagraStar LLC
Defendant:
Samuel Popescu
Dish Network LLC et al v. Brunner
as 3:2013cv02457
Plaintiff:
Dish Network LLC , Echostar Technologies LLC and Nagrastar LLC
Defendant:
Paul Brunner
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Communications Act of 1994
DISH Network LLC et al v. Hugo Barrera et al
as 2:2013cv01538
Defendant:
Hugo Barrera and Oscar Rivera
Plaintiff:
DISH Network LLC, EchoStar Technologies LLC and NagraStar LLC
DISH Network LLC et al v. Aurora Herrera
as 2:2013cv00585
Plaintiff:
DISH Network LLC, EchoStar Technologies LLC and NagraStar LLC
Defendant:
Aurora Herrera
Dish Network L.L.C., et al v. Gonzalez
as 1:2013cv00107
Plaintiff:
EchoStar Technologies L.L.C. , NagraStar LLC and Dish Network L.L.C.
Defendant:
Armando Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Dish Network L.L.C. et al v. Phu et al
as 3:2013cv00111
Plaintiff:
Dish Network L.L.C. , Echostar Technologies L.L.C. and Nagrastar LLC
Defendant:
Alan Phu, Alcy Investment LLC, Alcy & AJ Investment LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
