Cases 11 - 20 of 131
Hamilton v. Berryhill
as 8:2019cv00226
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Cassandraraelyn Hamilton and CassandraRaelynn Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gentles v. Berryhill
as 8:2019cv00208
Plaintiff:
Laurie Gentles
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Stockhoffer v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv01235
Plaintiff:
Annette Stockhoffer
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Melvin v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv00772
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Amanda Melvin and Amanda M. Melvin
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Salerno v. Nancy Berryhill
as 1:2019cv00627
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Anthony Salerno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jones v. Berryhill
as 7:2019cv00418
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Jones
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Camacho v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv00228
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Melvin Camacho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ferrentino v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv00148
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Charles Ferrentino
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Timmons v. Berryhill
as 8:2018cv01500
Plaintiff:
Marlene Timmons
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lopez v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv12201
Plaintiff:
Jorge Lopez
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Nancy A Berryhill
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
