Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Smith v. NaphCare US, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
Latonia Smith
Defendant:
NaphCare US, Inc. and Naphcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Washoe County et al
as 3:2022cv00445
Plaintiff:
Ryan Franklin and Franklin Ryan
Defendant:
Washoe County and NaphCare Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriquez v. Duran et al
as 2:2022cv01232
Plaintiff:
Jesus Rodriguez Rodriquez
Defendant:
Dr. Duran, NaphCare Inc., Armida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chatman v. Washoe County Detention Center
as 3:2022cv00287
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Marcel Chatman
Defendant:
Washoe County Detention Center, Washoe County, WCDF Officials and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Branch v. Washoe County et al
as 3:2022cv00273
Plaintiff:
Ashley Glynn Branch
Defendant:
Washoe County and Naphcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGilbra v. Washoe County et al
as 3:2022cv00245
Plaintiff:
Zafferine Amit McGilbra
Defendant:
Washoe County and Naphcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Washoe County et al
as 3:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
Shawn Rae Hancock
Defendant:
Washoe County and Naphcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Bean et al
as 2:2021cv01259
Defendant:
Theresa Wickham, Rhys Lim, Charles Daniels and others
Plaintiff:
Toney A. White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hart v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 2:2021cv00340
Defendant:
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, County of Clark, Clark County Detention Center, Naphcare, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Hart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Miles v. Clark County et al
as 2:2021cv00290
Defendant:
D Lorenza, NaphCare Inc., F Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Christian Stephon Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
